Shame All Around
Iceberg on April 18th, 2007 | File Under Iceberg Confidential -Nothing ever changes in the English-language Korea-related blogging world.
I woke up this morning, turned on my computer, and read the news that the Virginia Tech killer was a South Korean national. Unfortunately for me, my first thought was of the blogs. I thought, “Oh boy, this is going to get ugly.” Sure enough, the usual suspects showed up at The Marmot’s Hole comments section readied with - depending on which side of the fence they’ve placed themselves - either their accusations or their rationalizations. You see, it doesn’t matter what sort of Korea-related news comes down the pipe, it’s all just fuel for the engines of two sides that, though they can’t admit it to themselves, would rather hate than debate. On one side you have those who are eager to flaunt anything that comes their way to flog what they perceive as deficiencies in Korean culture and/or mindset. On the other you have those who receive the slightest criticism of Korea as a personal afront and/or an example of cultural imperialism and proceed to pull out the “yeah, buts”. Actually, both sides are pretty good at the “yeah, buts”. And both sides are perfectly aware that they are not going to change the other’s mind, but that is not the point nor the desire. It’s an angry place filled with angry people partaking in mental masturbation. And now here I am with my two strokes.
Bottom line: thirty-two people who didn’t deserve to die have lost their lives to a sick and deranged human being. That, and only that, is what matters. Any attempt to extrapolate from that to bolster tired arguments that were here yesterday and will be here tomorrow is pretty damn sad, because the victims from Virginia Tech will not be here tomorrow.
7 Comments
My brother, who lives in Vegas, was playing Hold ‘Em at an off-the-strip casino (I assume it was the “Fiesta”). He was dealt pocket kings and got a third on the flop, with the other two cards potential suited runners (say, for example, the five and six of clubs). I imagine my brother bet strong, but not too strong. Whatever. Someone stayed in. On the turn - the fourth king. At this point, I’m sure my brother decided to slow play his hand. I’m also pretty confident that at this point he was probably blind to what else was on the table, but it doesn’t really matter. If you’ve got four kings, you have to play them regardless. After the river my brother likely bet strong and then was surprised to see his opponent raise. Again, knowing my brother, he was probably giddy about this since he was sitting on four kings and re-raised. The problem? The river card was another club and his opponent showed a straight flush. Imagining the look on my brother’s face when he saw his opponent’s hand makes me chuckle. The good news in all of this is that the casino has something called a “Bad Beat” jackpot. A bad beat is when you have the stronger hand before the river, but someone draws a final card that allows them to beat your hand. A bad beat jackpot is given to someone who has an unusually strong hand (i.e. four kings) and still loses. In this case, my brother received $45,000. Not bad for losing a hand, eh?